MAHDI – Hybrid Learning https://hybridlearning.pk Online Learning Thu, 04 Jul 2024 18:44:22 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 MAHDI, AL-SADIQ AL https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/30/mahdi-al-sadiq-al/ https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/30/mahdi-al-sadiq-al/#respond Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:38:27 +0000 https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/30/mahdi-al-sadiq-al/ MAHDI, AL-SADIQ AL- (December 25, 1935), Sudanese Islamic-Mahdist theologian and contemporary political leader. As great-grandson of the Sudanese Mahdi, Muhammad Ahmad ibn `Abdallah (d. 1885), […]

]]>
MAHDI, AL-SADIQ AL- (December 25, 1935), Sudanese Islamic-Mahdist theologian and contemporary political leader. As great-grandson of the Sudanese Mahdi, Muhammad Ahmad ibn `Abdallah (d. 1885), Sadiq was born into a leading Islamic family and trained for his leadership role from birth. [See Mahdi; Mahdiyah.] He received a broad traditional Muslim education and later a modern one at Victoria College in Alexandria. He then studied at the University of Khartoum and graduated from St. Johns College, Oxford, where he read philosophy, politics, and economics. Sadiq rose to prominence in 1961 following the death of his father, Imam Siddlq al-Mahd-1.
Sadig Al-Mahdi
Sadig Al-Mahdi

The shura council of the Ansar decided that he was too young to become their imam and appointed his uncle al-Hadi instead. With the leadership divided and Sadiq heading the Ummah party, a split within the Ummah and the Ansar became unavoidable. It paved the way for a long-term pact between Sadiq and Hasan al-Turabi, the leader of Sudan’s Muslim Brothers. This was probably one of the factors that led Sadiq, a presumed liberal, to announce his intention, on becoming prime minister in 1966, to promulgate an Islamic constitution and found an Islamic state. Sadiq and his followers were defeated in the 1968 elections and had to seek a reconciliation with his conservative uncle. This seems to have turned him into a conservative, and the Ummah-Ansar complex in the 1980s was as autocratic as it had been under previous imams. As prime minister after the 1986 elections, Sadiq was in full control of both the Ansar and the Ummah. His failure to lead on the most crucial issues, the Islamic nature of the state and its interethnic and interreligious relations, probably caused his downfall in June 1989.
Sadiq was the most prominent leader to oppose the so-called shari’ah laws implemented by President Ja`far Nimeiri in September 1983. He denounced them as unIslamic because shari`ah could only be implemented in a just society in which Muslims were not forced to steal in order to survive. He failed to abolish these laws, however, while he was prime minister in 1986-1989, owing both to his ambivalence and to his weak leadership. His ambivalence was the result of his reluctance to abolish the existing Islamic laws, which after all he too had advocated, without introducing alternative ones first. He assumed that he would lose popular support if he submitted to southern and secularist demands for unconditional abrogation.
Sadiq has expressed his views on the Islamic state in many of his writings, and in these his ideology is by far more liberal and progressive than his political career would suggest. He rules that modern formulation of shari’ah should be entrusted to universities, with lay scholarly supervision; otherwise shari `ah will wither away, and Muslim leaders will have abdicated their trust. Islamic states may be traditional, modernizing, or revolutionary, as long as they abide by the general constitutional principles of Islam and as long as their legal systems are based on a traditional or modern formulation of shari `ah. In the sphere of economics, two principles should be applied. First, wealth is collectively owned by humanity, and while individual ownership is legitimate, society has to provide for the poor. Second, it is mandatory to implement special injunctions such as zakat, inheritance laws, and the prohibition of usury. Hence there is no contradiction in an economic system that is both Islamic and modern. Islamic international relations, according to Sadiq, are to be based on peaceful coexistence; war is justified to deter aggression and is not permitted as a way of enforcing Islam. Even pagans are not to be converted by force. In Islamic international relations there are four basic principles: human brotherhood, the supremacy of justice, the irreversibility of contracts, and reciprocity. Finally, Sadiq regards taqlid, or the uncritical adoption of a tradition or a legal decision, as a major curse; he claims that when non-Muslim opinion refers to Islamic fundamentalism, it is taghd they have in mind, which therefore should be abolished.
[See also Ansar; Sudan; Ummah-Ansar; and the biography of Turabi.]
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Mahdi, Al-Sadiq a1-. Yas’alunaka `an al-Mahdiyah. Beirut, 1975. Mahdi, Al-Sadiq al-. “The Concept of an Islamic State.” In The Challenge of Islam, edited by Altaf Gauhar, pp. 114-133. London, 1978. Mahdi, Al-Sadiq al-. “Islam-Society and Change.” In Voices of Resurgent Islam, edited by John L. Esposito, pp. 230-240. New York and Oxford, 1983.
Mahdi, Al-Sadiq al-. Al-dimuqratiyah ft al-Sudan, ‘a’ida wa-rajihah. Khartoum, 1990.
GABRIEL R. WARBURG

]]>
https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/30/mahdi-al-sadiq-al/feed/ 0
MAHDI https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/28/mahdi/ https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/28/mahdi/#respond Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:27:02 +0000 https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/28/mahdi/ MAHDI. The term mahdi (“divinely guided one”) has come to denote an eschatological figure whose presence will usher in an era of justice and true […]

]]>
MAHDI. The term mahdi (“divinely guided one”) has come to denote an eschatological figure whose presence will usher in an era of justice and true belief prior to the end of time. The origin of the word cannot be traced to the Qur’an, where in fact it is never mentioned, but rather to a strictly honorific title applied to the Prophet and first four caliphs by the earliest Muslims. The term was further developed by the Shi`is, who applied it to Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyah (a son of the caliph `All) who organized a revolt in 685. A Shi’i sect later came to revere this “rightly guided one” and deny his death, believing him to be in hiding. Other events in the history of Shiism paralleled this example-the Twelfth Imam, Muhammad ibn Hasan al-`Askari, who disappeared in 878, was designated a Mahdi-and so the idea evolved of a messianic deliverer (al-Mahdi al-muntazar) who would return to champion the cause of his adherents.
Although the idea of a Mahdi came to play a central part in Shi’i belief, it enjoyed no such recognition in Sunni Islam, where trust in the consensus of the learned and faith in the community’s capacity for self-reform made such a figure doctrinally unnecessary. Rather, the concept took hold strictly in popular Sunni belief during the early centuries of political unrest. Supporting various contenders in their claims was a large and overgrowing body of prophetic traditions (hadith) regarding the Mahdi. Certain common themes run through these developing traditions: the Mahdi will be of the Prophet’s family, he will bear the Prophet’s name, and his father will bear the Prophet’s father’s name (i.e., he will be called Muhammad ibn `Abd Allah); he will appear when the world has reached its worst state of affairs; his reign will be a time of natural abundance, and he will spread justice, restore the faith, and defeat the enemies of Islam; miraculous signs will accompany his manifestation, and he will be generous and divide the wealth. On many matters the traditions disagree-hence their broad applicability. In general, the Sunni notion of a Mahdi came to represent more a restorer of the faith than the Shi’i incarnation of God, and one who would be chosen for office rather than returning from hiding. Important vehicles for the spread of this idea were the writings of various Sufi sages, including the influential Ibn al-‘Arabi (d. 1240).
Attesting to the popularity of the Mahdi idea is the abundance of claimants to that title in Islamic history. Muhammad `Ubayd Allah (d. 934), the first Fatimid caliph, came to power in North Africa through a manipulation of Mahdist expectations and Shi`i sentiment. Manifesting himself at Jabal Massa in the Maghribthereafter an expected site of the Mahdi’s appearancehe claimed descent from the Prophet’s daughter Fatimah and was alleged to be the brother of the hidden Twelfth Imam. The founder of the Almohad reform movement in the twelfth century, Muhammad ibn Tumart (d. I130), also claimed to be the Mahdi with descent from the Caliph `Ali. In particular, the arrival of the thirteenth Islamic century (1785-1883 CE), which had long been expected as a time of great messianic importance, increased Mahdist belief. During that period at least three leaders of reform movements in West Africa-Shaykh Usuman din Fodio of Sokoto, Shaykh Ahmadu Bari of Masina and al-Hajj `Umar Tal of the Tukolor empire-exploited Mahdist tendencies to launch their jihads. Expectations of the Mahdi’s arrival from the east attracted waves of West African emigrants to the Nile and facilitated the rise and success of the Sudanese Mahdi Muhammad Ahmad (d. 1885). [See the biographies of Dan Fodio and `Umar Tal.] Several Mahdis meanwhile arose in Egypt, leading uprisings against both French occupation and Egyptian government rule. By the end of the 19th century, Mahdist revolts against European imperialism were almost commonplace, occurring for example in India, Algeria, Senegal, Ghana, and Nigeria. Common to all such movements was the perceived corruption of Islamic ideals and nefarious influence of Western political and cultural hegemony. More recently, such thinking inspired the 1979 seizure of the Grand Mosque of Mecca by a Saudi Arabian Mahdi; ShM criticism of the Americanled “New World Order” has also been couched in Mahdist terms. Given the emotive power of messianism and the flexible conditions of the Mahdi’s appearance, claims to that authority may be expected wherever Islamic interests are perceived to be threatened.
[See also Eschatology; Messianism; Revival and Renewal.]
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Holt, P. M. “Islamic Millenarianism and the Fulfillment of Prophecy.” In Prophecy and Millenarianism, edited by Ann Williams, pp. 337-347. London, 1980. Overview of the Sudanese Mahdiyah within the context of Islamic ideas of a Mahdi.
Ibn. Khaldun. The Muqaddimah. 3 vols. Translated by Franz Rosenthal. New York, 1958. Classic study of the philosophy of history and sociology, written in 1377 by the North African Arab scholar. Chapter 3 contains an important discussion of Muslim popular beliefs in a Mahdi, with emphasis on Sufi and ShIN influences. Sachedina, A. A. Islamic Messianism: The Idea of Mahdi in Twelver Shi ism. Albany, N.Y., 1981. The most complete study to date of the idea of a Mahdi in Islam, emphasizing Shi’i beliefs but also treating the development of the idea in Sunni Islam.
ROBERT S.KRAMER

]]>
https://hybridlearning.pk/2014/07/28/mahdi/feed/ 0